2 ms·
Sharing can also be detrimental to general well being, depending on circumstances — what is being shared, by whom, and with whom. For example, in many non-indi
by xyzzyz 5y ago
Sharing can also be detrimental to general well being, depending on circumstances — what is being shared, by whom, and with whom.
For example, in many non-individualistic societies, if one is to come upon some extra wealth, in manner of for example successful hunt, bountiful harvests, or good government job, one is duty-bound to share that extra wealth with others in their clan or tribe. This disincentives trying hard and increasing productivity: if, through increased labor and investment in fertilizer you can double your yield, but then only get a small fraction of that gain for yourself, why bother trying in the first place? In fact, it might be better investment to obtain higher status in your clan or tribe, so that others will be bound to share more of their wealth with you.