A good argument against X might try to show probable -- or, failing that, plausible -- consequences of X. But that video's too much like, "If they pass this la

A good argument against X might try to show probable -- or, failing that, plausible -- consequences of X. But that video's too much like, "If they pass this law I don't like, aliens will invade, earthquakes will shake, and volcanos will erupt!". If you want to make a real point that people care about, it has to make sense. You can't just make up non-sense, cite "artistic license", and expect people to believe it.