It is true that no single individual agreed, but _society as a whole_ did. Re: statement 1, if any single individual were able to disagree, a murderer could ju

It is true that no single individual agreed, but _society as a whole_ did. Re: statement 1, if any single individual were able to disagree, a murderer could just say 'I don't consent with the social contract, because I believe it's within my rights to murder'. At that point, I don't see how you can describe it any other way than 'anarchism', as anybody can then choose the rules that apply to themselves without regard to other members of society. Re: statement 2, the terms aren't set in stone, they can be changed by the people, i.e. via democratic processes or via revolution. Anyway, we are going in circles here, and you are also continuing to call my attempt at a good-faith discussion 'dishonest', so this will be my last comment on the topic. Have a good day.