> How is the comparison to doublespeak absurd? Because the accusation has absolutely nothing to do with doublespeak, and given the fundamental difference betwe

> How is the comparison to doublespeak absurd? Because the accusation has absolutely nothing to do with doublespeak, and given the fundamental difference between the meaning of doublespeak and the case discussed then it's so far-fetched that just reads as a desperate attempt to gratuitously pin the fascist label. > They are literally making contradictory statements while refusing to make any logical association between them. If you knew the definition of doublespeak and read the article and the comments you'd quickly understand the absurdity of your accusation.