5 ms·
I would think the social discontent is more harmful to society than the excess diesel soot itself. I imagine if I were in the position of a broke truck driver t
by not_a_shill 5y ago
I would think the social discontent is more harmful to society than the excess diesel soot itself. I imagine if I were in the position of a broke truck driver trying to get by I would see the guy trying to take money out of my pocket as more of an existential threat than soot.
- noahtallen 5y agoBut it’s not soot, it’s poison. Is there a legitimate reason for the driver to leave the truck idling?
- not_a_shill 5y agoI don't think the distinction between soot and poison really changes the willingness of someone to physically attack a snitch. As for legitimate reasons to leave it idle, I have no idea.
- sgjohnson 5y ago> As for legitimate reasons to leave it idle, I have no idea. Air conditioning/heating
- Godel_unicode 5y agoIf you get in and out of the cab all day, wear more clothes. That's what I did, worked great. In the summer it's just not that big a deal, you're sweating in every other part of the job anyway. Roll the windows down maybe. If you're talking about the cargo, the insulation will easily keep up over an hour or two plus of being stopped.
- NullPrefix 5y agoDriving with frosted up windows is not safe
- Godel_unicode 5y agoI'm not sure what this comment means, sorry.
- xkqd 5y agoYou run the heater to defrost the glass in your car. It often takes a few minutes for it to be effective. Otherwise, you can’t see and you’re a danger to yourself and others. In the winter, it’s more common than putting gas in your car. It’s kinda odd explaining this though
- AnthonBerg 5y agoI live in the subarctic region, a stone’s throw away from the arctic circle. We have snow and frost in winter. We use ice scrapers. :) As a matter of self-reliance and/or common courtesy. Defrosting the windows with the engine is really not nice, especially not when it’s a diesel with the fumes hanging in the winter air and going inside people’s windows and into baby carriages and kindergarteners’ noses.
- notch656a 5y ago
- Godel_unicode 5y agoIt's not only not nice, it's a genuinely bad idea. If you have large sheets of glass (truck windows) and large heat differentials, you are asking for catastrophic failure due to uneven expansion. I know multiple people this has happened to personally, and there are also some truck manufacturers who recommend against this kind of defrosting for exactly this reason.
- giantg2 5y agoIf it's running equipment (refrigerator, loading deck, food truck, overnight accommodation, cold weather, etc). If they really want to make a difference, they should enforce this against individuals too, not just companies. Lots of people leave cars idling when waiting in the heat/cold/rain. That adds up too.
- woodruffw 5y agoIf you talk to a random sampling of New Yorkers, I suspect that you'd find much more social discontent in the lax enforcement of our idling and parking laws (and related things, like placard abuse) than in this. (Besides: it's a strange thing to appeal to when one side is physically assaulting the other.)
- not_a_shill 5y agoI imagine that would be true. There are very few people getting beat up by truck drivers relative to the number of people who don't like lax enforcement of idling and parking laws, placard abuse, etc. >(Besides: it's a strange thing to appeal to when one side is physically assaulting the other.) To many people there is not much difference between physical and economic damage. Add in the perceived personal disrespect and that's why you get fights.
- fredophile 5y agoThe pollution from the idling vehicle is an externality that the truck driver isn't paying for. Why should they be allowed to do that?
- notch656a 5y agoYou're buying food transported by trucks that burn diesel, producing externalities that you haven't paid for. Why should you be allowed to do that?
- fredophile 5y agoI shouldn't. The externalities should be charged where they occur and any increase in price should be passed on to me.
- notch656a 5y ago>I shouldn't [ be allowed to buy food ] Thanks, that should be all we really need to see here. > The externalities should be charged where they occur You can walk to the farm and negotiate with the farmer to buy from him rather than allowing it to be transported back by diesel, are you doing this or is this just more hypocrisy?
- fredophile 5y ago> >I shouldn't [ be allowed to buy food ] > Thanks, that should be all we really need to see here. I've never said that I shouldn't be allowed to buy food. I simply believe that when I do, I should pay the true cost of it. > You can walk to the farm and negotiate with the farmer to buy from him rather than allowing it to be transported back by diesel, are you doing this or is this just more hypocrisy? You have an oddly black and white view of the world. There are plenty of things that I think we should change that currently benefit me. I can participate in the system while still recognizing its flaws and arguing that they should be fixed. I can't reasonably opt out of everything where I disagree with some aspect of it. Do you believe that politicians should vote against all bills that they disagree with any part of? I think the wealthy in my country should pay more taxes than they currently do. I make more than the median income so this would probably result in me paying more taxes too. I can hold this view without donating part of my salary to the government. I'm against capital punishment. If I see someone committing a crime they could receive the death penalty for I'll still call the police. Do you believe that these views also make me a hypocrite?