4 ms·
The citation is in my comment. Here it is again: https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/26/facebook-ban-covid-man-made-491053 https://www.politico.com/news/2021
by insickness 5y ago
The citation is in my comment. Here it is again:
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/26/facebook-ban-covid-man-made-491053 https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/26/facebook-ban-covid-...
More:
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-06-07/facebook-youtube-erred-in-censoring-covid-19-misinformation https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-06-07/facebo...
- WalterGR 5y agoTo say that Covid may have originated in a lab would get you censored on youtube, facebook and most other social media Your citation does not say this.
- insickness 5y ago> Facebook will no longer take down posts claiming that Covid-19 was man-made or manufactured, a company spokesperson told POLITICO on Wednesday, a move that acknowledges the renewed debate about the virus’ origins.
- WalterGR 5y agoRight. Facebook would take down content “claiming that Covid-19 was man-made or manufactured”. I’m not arguing against cited claims. Your wording is broader, emphasis added here to highlight the differences from the above text: “To say that Covid may have originated in a lab would get you censored on youtube, facebook and most other social media.” In table form, what’s been cited would look like this: Service _____ would take down content that said the lab leak / human manufacturing _____ happened: Did Maybe YouTube Facebook * Most other sm