>I think leaving the law at "don't interfere with the police during their job" is good enough. Those already exist, of course, including[0]: * Failure to comp

>I think leaving the law at "don't interfere with the police during their job" is good enough. Those already exist, of course, including[0]: * Failure to comply with police officer; classification * Refusing to Aid a Peace Officer * Obstructing Criminal Investigations of Prosecutions * Refusing to provide truthful name when lawfully detained * Impersonating a public servant * Obstructing a highway or other public thoroughfare No matter how reasonable the law may read on its face, the clear goal is empowering more police abuse and less oversight. The history of police conduct in arizona makes this readily apparent.[e.g., 1] [0] https://www.jacksonwhitelaw.com/criminal-defense-law/obstructing-governmental-operations-arizona-ars-13-2402/ https://www.jacksonwhitelaw.com/criminal-defense-law/obstruc... [1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/08/31/actor-steven-seagal-sued-for-driving-tank-into-arizona-home-killing-puppy/?sh=33ad53077489 https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/08/31/actor-steve...