4 ms·
I think the wikipedia explanation is much better. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction_spike https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction_spike One deficien
by hatsunearu 5y ago
I think the wikipedia explanation is much better.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction_spike https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction_spike
One deficiency is why apertures (effectively, the support structure in a telescope is an aperture) observe this behavior.
> No matter how fine these support rods are they diffract the incoming light from a subject star and this appears as diffraction spikes which are the Fourier transform of the support struts.
Like why is that the case?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airy_disk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airy_disk
Read this if you don't immediately understand why. This is the shape of the image you see when the aperture is circular. This is the Fourier transform of a circular aperture, which, in 1D, is a sinc function.
I can't give a straightfoward answer to elucidate further, but if you've done signal processing stuff before you can probably handwavey explain that if there is a Fourier-transform relationship with one function, due to linearity and spacial invariance, you can say that it holds for all functions.
- pmoriarty 5y agoSo we're not actually seeing the image of a star but only its Fourier transform? I presume that only happens if the star is far enough away, as there are plenty of images of our Sun (which is much closer) that don't look like this.
- Tagbert 5y agoFor larger objects with a larger subtended angle, we are probably seeing the union of the Fourier transforms of each “pixel” (I’m not sure what the smallest element would be, in this case).