> I'm not sure what else they could do to force you to consider that it has a temporal component. I’m not saying they could have done it a better way necessari

> I'm not sure what else they could do to force you to consider that it has a temporal component. I’m not saying they could have done it a better way necessarily, just that these kinds of problems are much more obvious in a callback-based style > What is a programmer supposed to take away from this, other than general FUD? A ping on their radar about what might be going wrong next time they encounter a bug like this. And/or, a topic to go read up on if this is all new and surprising to them.