3 ms·
> is all about helping you forget that you're writing asynchronous code I get what you're saying but you literally need to type out "async" and "await" to use
by bastawhiz 5y ago
> is all about helping you forget that you're writing asynchronous code
I get what you're saying but you literally need to type out "async" and "await" to use it. I'm not sure what else they could do to force you to consider that it has a temporal component.
My issue is that this article 1) doesn't actually mention any specific problems 2) doesn't show or discuss any examples at all 3) doesn't offer any advice about what to do. What is a programmer supposed to take away from this, other than general FUD?
- brundolf 5y ago> I'm not sure what else they could do to force you to consider that it has a temporal component. I’m not saying they could have done it a better way necessarily, just that these kinds of problems are much more obvious in a callback-based style > What is a programmer supposed to take away from this, other than general FUD? A ping on their radar about what might be going wrong next time they encounter a bug like this. And/or, a topic to go read up on if this is all new and surprising to them.