3 ms·
> The truth is that most US infrastructure is not required. Would you say more? This is a bold claim.
by gkop 5y ago
> The truth is that most US infrastructure is not required.
Would you say more? This is a bold claim.
- hervature 5y agoMaybe most is unwarranted but certainly some [1]. [1] - https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2019/1/23/iowa-dot-helps-educate https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2019/1/23/iowa-dot-helps...
- vgel 5y agoThis article is about a road diet in terms of restriping an existing road with fewer lanes, but the same amount of asphalt (and, given the additional markings, probably a similar amount of paint). I don't see what that has to do with the infrastructure being not needed.
- renewiltord 5y agoThis comment box is too small to provide a proof ;) I’m sorry, it’s not fair to make a controversial statement and then leave it at that but I only had the appetite to provide the hypothesis (easy) not the backing (I’ve got to collate my notes on this). But, if you’re down to meet in SF one evening in April we could go over it.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]