3 ms·
Yeah, it does seem odd. Perhaps it's about the path of least resistance. Laying power lines, contracting with the grid, and so forth is a bunch of up front inve
by ip26 5y ago
Yeah, it does seem odd. Perhaps it's about the path of least resistance. Laying power lines, contracting with the grid, and so forth is a bunch of up front investment.
Maybe Tesla could drop down a battery pack & install superchargers? There's a synergy between "place too remote to ship out power for selling" and "place too remote to ship in power for electric cars"
- asciimike 5y agoIn the hierarchy of moving things around, from difficult to easy: - natural gas (building a pipeline) - electricity (generation, transformers, high voltage lines, etc.) - bits (copper, fiber, microwave, cellular, satellite all are viable for low bandwidth operation) It's orders of magnitude in terms of cost difference. The issue with superchargers is mostly that these places are in the middle of nowhere--nobody is going to be driving their Tesla across the Permian.
- ip26 5y agoThere is no city, but Highway 10 runs through the Permian, and Big Bend National Park is just south. Ironically, with Tesla's new plant in Austin a few hundred miles east, there may be a lot of Teslas in the Permian soon.