5 ms·
They also test the native performance of Photoshop's notoriously computationally intensive brushes. >Ultra also enabled Alex to use features of Photoshop that
by GeekyBear 5y ago
They also test the native performance of Photoshop's notoriously computationally intensive brushes.
>Ultra also enabled Alex to use features of Photoshop that he’s never been able to use before. The process that blew all of our professionals’ minds was the brushes. Alex was able to paint a white layer with a media brush, and it was instant — it really looked like he was painting with a physical brush. That tool requires so much computing power that many current machines can’t handle it. It was a breeze for the Studio.
“Having a machine like this in my daily process would change everything,” Alex told me after his testing period.
https://www.theverge.com/22981815/apple-mac-studio-m1-ultra-max-review https://www.theverge.com/22981815/apple-mac-studio-m1-ultra-...
- ianai 5y agoThat would have been a much better take to include than the graphics apple shared in the announcement. Probably would have sold more units faster, not that it was needed.
- smoldesu 5y agoHow is this relevant to a comparison between the 3090 and the M1 Ultra? They're comparing it to the Macs they already own.
- GeekyBear 5y agoBecause Adobe software doesn't tap into CUDA if you have an NVidia graphics card on a PC?