Maybe people should abandon these cities. It's sunk cost fallacy, I think? This land is valuable, therefore we'll invest enormous resources into keeping it liva

Maybe people should abandon these cities. It's sunk cost fallacy, I think? This land is valuable, therefore we'll invest enormous resources into keeping it livable, creating even more climate change, requiring even more investment... Eventually they'll have to be abandoned anyway, that energy use would be way more efficient just a few miles inland. Which I just realized is in part what you said :D