3 ms·
> Also NAT is not routing The term "transparent routing" is used throughout the document to identify the routing functionality that a NAT device provides
by zokier 5y ago
> Also NAT is not routing
The term "transparent routing" is used throughout the document to
identify the routing functionality that a NAT device provides. This
is different from the routing functionality provided by a traditional
router device in that a traditional router routes packets within a
single address realm.
Transparent routing refers to routing a datagram between disparate
address realms, by modifying address contents in the IP header to be
valid in the address realm into which the datagram is routed.
Section 3.2 has a detailed description of transparent routing.
Section 2.2 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2663 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2663
NAT is still routing, even if it is different than "traditional" routing.
- fulafel 5y agoThat's an "informational" rfc by an individual that doesn't represent the IETF position. Whereas the router requirements is a standards track document. (And the reason it's a informational RFC is that IETF didn't want to encourage NAT)