> Third, somebody not close to the silicon but close to the ledger books looks at all this glorious CPU and memory on an ECU and realizes there are unused resou

> Third, somebody not close to the silicon but close to the ledger books looks at all this glorious CPU and memory on an ECU and realizes there are unused resources being paid for and going to waste. They realize they can stick logos on their product marketing material if they start using those spare resources for AI technologies. Yes folks, some of those ECUs are starting to crunch numbers using Fortran libraries driven by Python. From a consumer point of view it's great because the software can now make up for bad hardware dynamically, adaptively, and in real time. From a functional safety engineering point of view, as long as all hazards are mitigated and all failure modes lead to a safe state, it's not a bad thing. That's gross. Like that hardware uses no power, its purpose is to be at attention every foot of the journey. That's waiting, which in western culture means "slacking off", but in other cultures, like African cultures, is...well I don't know quite, but I think it's neither work nor rest. It's like going to a restaurant, you want the waiter to wait on you, you do your thing and when you need him he'll be ready. Maybe you'll need him often, or not even once. Doesn't matter, he still waited on you. Doesn't have to be moving all his arms and legs every second from the minute you walk in to the minute you leave, if he's ready to help when you need him, it's much more useful. Ultimately for tickless chips to be work there has to be a change in mentality that respects waiting as unique, that values availability without requiring effort. I guess it goes back to the idea in the west that values effort in different ways, rather than results. Effort meaning personal cost, too. Well when I was an employee I'd say they're both valued, equally, in the following way: you get paid according to the minimum of the two. Good results? Yeah but that only took you an hour, that only cost you $20, "don't complain." Working really hard but not achieving the goals? We're going to have to fire you and rehire at a lower wage that you can actually bring in. And that's why employees are so "resentful" about working, they're not, it's just an optimization function, if they're producing good value they have to look like they're working hard or there's a big cost to them of producing it, that's the resentful part, otherwise they get cheated. And further, it explains forfeiting results for the business all the time, if they're maxed out on the effort part they won't make a single fucking cent from it. Even if it costs nothing, bad idea, no working for free because then the floodgates of exploitation open. The employee does not want to work for an even richer, and therefore more powerful, employer if that employer is exploitative.