4 ms·
It's 123m and that's an easy number to remember. (404ft). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_church_buildings_in_the_United_Kingdom https://en.wiki
by pklausler 5y ago
It's 123m and that's an easy number to remember. (404ft).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_church_buildings_in_the_United_Kingdom https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_church_buildin...
- gerdesj 5y agoThere's a rounding error there. I recall the interview and I'm pretty sure the height was quoted to 1 decimal place which is pretty mad.
- bidirectional 5y agoI doubt that very much, could you provide a reference? I also remembered the height of 123m from the original poisoning reports, because it is rather a memorable number.
- jkadlec 5y agoThey said 123m in the interview, at least in the translation. But the point of the released interview was not to refute that they worked for the GRU. It was obvious to everybody. The point of that interview was to spite the West, by making it even more obvious that they were not tourists. Russia does this a lot, they don't even pretend that the stuff they put out is true. It's basically adding insult to injury.