4 ms·

This story seems to keep getting buried and removed. How fitting.

• smoldesu 5y ago
  Probably because a. The source is a notorious tabloid site and b. The contents of the story itself hardly qualify as intellectually stimulating Maybe if there was a more complete, objective breakdown of what happened (or a technical explaination) people would be willing to discuss it at length. Nobody here owes you upvotes though, certainly not for the sort of content that doesn't really hit the frontpage in the first place anyways. Maybe Reddit would be a better place to drop this one?
  • radford-neal 5y ago
    Good grief. We're talking about the suppression by tech companies of a true story of quite considerable significance in the context of the US election. If the story had not been suppressed, it is very possible that the election would have gone the other way. And you think that's not worthy of discussing because it's not "intellectually stimulating"???
  • TrispusAttucks 5y ago
    Not sure if this is very clever satire or not. I suppose we should stick to the sources that hide the truth from us, like good little citizens. /s