> The entirety of the miners could leave the US (this would not be a good thing for the US economy in the future) This is the outcome I expect, and the US will

> The entirety of the miners could leave the US (this would not be a good thing for the US economy in the future) This is the outcome I expect, and the US will have less energy waste, which is a nice benefit. > Crazy is not understand the largest separation between money and state in human history. Bitcoin is not more separate from the state than gold and silver, and it suffers many of the same problems. > You cannot tell apriori a tx is from a sanctioned party As soon as a wallet is identified as belonging to a sanctioned individual, no further transactions from that wallet will be accepted. > and after the fact it’s way too late... you cannot undo transactions This is not necessary. The value of the transferred coins drops because all downstream UTXOs are blacklisted from regulated exchanges. Nobody in the US or any other country that regulates cryptocurrencies will accept the tainted coins. > blocks and rewards can be mined so that they are unattributable. This has the same problem as currently unknown wallets that I listed above. As soon as the owner of a wallet is identified, all its contents become tainted. In practice, this means that people will be less likely to accept payment from unknown wallets, which results in market forces that will push for every transacting wallet to be identified. > We are 13 years in here. Because the state has ignored the harms of decentralized cryptocurrencies until this point. This is simply about being ahead of the law instead of being above the law.