3 ms·

> I'm not complaining Sure you are. Your comment is a classic example of what I call 'sore winner' literature. It's characterized by: a superior pontificatin

> I'm not complaining Sure you are. Your comment is a classic example of what I call 'sore winner' literature. It's characterized by: a superior pontificating tone, a sense of entitlement tell others what to do, a certain intellectual rigidity, a tendency to assign readings, but most important of all, a tone of having been cheated out of something by random strangers on the internet. Calculate your share, if you really must have it so badly, and I'll cut a penny down and mail it to you then.

Jerrrry 5y ago
winners telling losers how to win isn't a "sore winner" mentality, it is a charitable attempt to help others. how am I simultaneously a winner, but feel cheated? again, you literally quoted three words, strawmanned it up, and ignore the rest. no substance to be found. the "superior" tone is your perception, but if the issue being discussed (peoples not wanting to work), no discourse can be had without hints of condescension. the labor shortage in the market cannot be discussed, because you think it is condescending... what a fantastic exchange of ideas, i am sure you are littered with nuanced views. /s (you are not.) ironically, coincidentally, and incidentally, I am statistically probably the most "impoverished" here; allowing me actual insight into the markets you claim to have a moral aptitude towards. people do not want to work. the left think the billionaires should make robots do it (see the above poster), the right are just tired of low-paying jobs that prevent them from being on welfare. i know you didn't get this far, but if you have any substinant rebuttal to any or all of my arguments, im sure you would had presented at least one by now, instead of again, ad hominem and strawmans. calling you a "fucktwit", deservingly, but also so @dang can read this, and maybe put thought into comment rankings, if he has some brain cells left from staring at walls of shallow dialogue all day.
- gerbilly 5y ago
  Dude you come on real strong and tell people that they should work harder, or pay back money or whatever. There's nothing to refute because you can't refute tone. Plus it's not my job to be your debate partner for free. Basically, either don't tell people what to do, or set conditions on how they should debate you, or you will get voted down. But really, I suspect you are getting just what you want, really, pissing people off and making a stink.
  - dijonman2 5y ago
    I happen to think he’s spot on, fwiw.

Jerrrry 5y ago

winners telling losers how to win isn't a "sore winner" mentality, it is a charitable attempt to help others. how am I simultaneously a winner, but feel cheated? again, you literally quoted three words, strawmanned it up, and ignore the rest. no substance to be found. the "superior" tone is your perception, but if the issue being discussed (peoples not wanting to work), no discourse can be had without hints of condescension. the labor shortage in the market cannot be discussed, because you think it is condescending... what a fantastic exchange of ideas, i am sure you are littered with nuanced views. /s (you are not.) ironically, coincidentally, and incidentally, I am statistically probably the most "impoverished" here; allowing me actual insight into the markets you claim to have a moral aptitude towards. people do not want to work. the left think the billionaires should make robots do it (see the above poster), the right are just tired of low-paying jobs that prevent them from being on welfare. i know you didn't get this far, but if you have any substinant rebuttal to any or all of my arguments, im sure you would had presented at least one by now, instead of again, ad hominem and strawmans. calling you a "fucktwit", deservingly, but also so @dang can read this, and maybe put thought into comment rankings, if he has some brain cells left from staring at walls of shallow dialogue all day.

gerbilly 5y ago
Dude you come on real strong and tell people that they should work harder, or pay back money or whatever. There's nothing to refute because you can't refute tone. Plus it's not my job to be your debate partner for free. Basically, either don't tell people what to do, or set conditions on how they should debate you, or you will get voted down. But really, I suspect you are getting just what you want, really, pissing people off and making a stink.
- dijonman2 5y ago
  I happen to think he’s spot on, fwiw.