It is really unfortunate that they have written such a biased article, because it's completely unnecessary. I think the article is correct that fastmail has a m

It is really unfortunate that they have written such a biased article, because it's completely unnecessary. I think the article is correct that fastmail has a much better usability story due to it just being a regular email service. However, Protonmails whole raison d'etre is that they do on server encryption which they can't even decrypt themselves. It gets swept completely under the rug. They could have just come to the conclusion that if you want ultimate "privacy" and be sure that no one can read your emails "at rest" take Protonmail if you want features take fastmail. That would have been a fair assessment, the way it's written now just makes it come across as a advertisement piece. Maybe they feel customer's moving to Protonmail. P. S.: I say this as a happy fastmail customer