A professor of law from the University of Tennessee pens an article about global economics with a lot of snide and insinuation but little in the way of anything

A professor of law from the University of Tennessee pens an article about global economics with a lot of snide and insinuation but little in the way of anything actionable and it appears in the NY Post? Okay. What would this professor have us do instead? They never paint an alternative solution and contrast that alternative's pros and cons with the ones we have now. It's fair to ask whether the economic sanctions are worth it but that question is never asked and certainly not analyzed. I guess that would require too much work and so we're left with a hefty helping of snide instead.