3 ms·
Maybe I'm weird, but I find naming like this really off-putting. It's startlingly unprofessional, unnecessarily aggressive, somewhat immature, and just doesn't
by Cd00d 5y ago
Maybe I'm weird, but I find naming like this really off-putting. It's startlingly unprofessional, unnecessarily aggressive, somewhat immature, and just doesn't feel nice.
Why do something great and then put a less than best foot forward when naming it?
- salawat 5y agoIf thou dost not understand, lurk (or fork) moar! I jest, but I see it as follows: There're two sides to the programmer. One is as the frustrated artist, tormented by failure and imperfection, that rages at a machine that they just want to do what they mean, and not what they say. Then there is the stoic, caring gardener, worried about cultivating this or that, or what the environment as a whole looks like. Maybe even venturing to give a shit about what others think. One builds. The other maintains. The two sides do not without effort integrate, and once integrated, (enlightenment) happens, you tend to become more aware of such concerns, and it can buffer against the primordial drive to create this thing now without reflection. I see it as the builder's yin to the maintainer's yang. I love it. It is a sign the hacker spirit is still alive and well.