4 ms·
Or more likely because that costs money to implement "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"
by ChrisRR 5y ago
Or more likely because that costs money to implement
"never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"
- someotherperson 5y agoThat's on a personal level. As far as companies go, it should be "never attribute to stupidity which is adequately explained by malice." This also goes for assuming good faith -- when companies reach a certain size, the mantra instead becomes "always assume bad faith."
- jjulius 5y ago>Or more likely because that costs money to implement Kinda like how paying devs to push firmware updates to a damn microwave costs a lot more money than making a microwave that just works and doesn't need OTA updates?
- pixl97 5y agoYes, but you cant sell the 'regular' microwave for more because its special. And there is no way to sell marketing data with a regular microwave.