Yep. They kind of hint at the end that the real solution is to actually fix urllib. Removing it is a mistake IMO, even if it's for "security reasons" but especi

Yep. They kind of hint at the end that the real solution is to actually fix urllib. Removing it is a mistake IMO, even if it's for "security reasons" but especially if it's for a bad API. I'd rather it be included and kind of broken than removed.