3 ms·
You have people advocating medical treatments against the advice of medical professionals. The arguments include using studies they have no basis to understand
by jmull 5y ago
You have people advocating medical treatments against the advice of medical professionals. The arguments include using studies they have no basis to understand and which don't actually support their theory. Not that they care since they are just looking for points to superficially support their predetermined conclusion, which they formed listening to Joe Rogen or reading social media posts.
You don't want to call that a conspiracy theory, but then what should it be called?
And which media outlets have been calling people stupid rednecks? You have a grievance against "the media", but who exactly is that?
I'm really a lot more concerned with the irresponsibility of pushing ineffective medical treatments to a serious health hazard than I am with how gently "the media" tells people that their conspiracy theories are wrong.
- mistermann 5y ago> I'm really a lot more concerned with the irresponsibility of pushing ineffective medical treatments to a serious health hazard than I am with how gently "the media" tells people that their conspiracy theories are wrong. Perhaps you should be concerned with that which causes more harm. After all, a lack of concern for what is true is the fundamental flaw with conspiracy theorists is it not?