All of your points have no certainty. I'm not sure what you're attempting to show here? > I think the reality is that because there are holes in the response

All of your points have no certainty. I'm not sure what you're attempting to show here? > I think the reality is that because there are holes in the response to covid, people dismiss the whole I think a more salient point is perhaps that because so much effort was put into covering the 'holes' (not to mention the coining and dissemination of the label 'misinformation') rather than be honest about them, distrust was created. It is sensible to question when any groups make concerted efforts to dismiss and censor alternative views, regardless of the merits. Evidence and transparency on the side of the reason/truth should not need such measures. The authorities and press infantalised the population on the assumption people are too stupid to process information and make their own informed choices. This is bad precedent.