6 ms·
This has not been true since at least 2005: https://www.nature.com/articles/438900a https://www.nature.com/articles/438900a Now someone will say Nature is unre
by zeckalpha 5y ago
This has not been true since at least 2005: https://www.nature.com/articles/438900a https://www.nature.com/articles/438900a
Now someone will say Nature is unreliable and we need to wait for findings to replicated in more applicable domain-specific journals…
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]