3 ms·
>>much of America, for example, thinks the right to existence of LGBTQ folks is up for debate. I would love for you to expand upon that, why you believe that?
by syshum 5y ago
>>much of America, for example, thinks the right to existence of LGBTQ folks is up for debate.
I would love for you to expand upon that, why you believe that? I am not aware any wide spread opposition to the "existence" of LGBTQ people, I am aware of wide wide spread resistance to Speech Codes (enforced use pro-nouns), Sexual education to minors, Allowing children to transition under the age of 18, allowing children to transition with out the consent of the parents, and other topics around CHILDREN.
Is that what you refer to when you state that the "existence" of LGBTQ people is under threat in the US?
- beecafe 5y agoequating LGBTQ people with sex and sex only already implies you don't think of them as people. Nor do you care about the experiences of LBGTQ children
- syshum 5y agoI dont believe I did that, The only time I mention sex was in regards to sexual education in schools, which is current event given the new law in FL, incorrectly dubbed the "dont say gay bill". To equate my statement to being "equating LGBTQ people with sex and sex only" likely means you have no desire for an honest dialog. I will say though it is likely we disagree on these issues because I do believe parental consent and transparency is critical and non-optional and will never agree that state actors (i.e schools) should with hold information from parents for any reason outside illegal abuse which should be reported to the proper authorities and investigated criminally with full due process protections, not under the some guise that the schools/teachers know best.