2 ms·

I have never said that he _only_ platforms experts that agree with him. I’m saying the skew is enormous. So (say) 99% of the relevant scientific and medical co

• edmcnulty101 5y ago
  • HL33tibCe7 5y ago
    You need to go back and re-read my comment. He is skewing by cherry-picking. The two aren’t mutually incompatible.
    • edmcnulty101 5y ago
      It's skew to you because the world is binary to you. My opinions vs The bad guys. Joe Rogan has people with all kinds of differing opinions to create a rich marketplace of ideas where the idea wins on merit not censorship. As I said, there's no reason to have more than one main stream person repeating the same thing repeated on every network. When Labotomies won the Nobel Prize you would have possibly been upset that anyone would be questioning the science.
      • bena 5y ago
        > create a rich marketplace of ideas where the idea wins on merit not censorship. This is demonstrably false. Ideas on Joe Rogan do not win on merit. Unless merit is based on quantity of bullshit.
        • edmcnulty101 5y ago
          Not with that attitude!
• wozniacki 5y ago
  Youre trying to appear too clever. If you had not meant that you should have said as much. You were stopping just short of implying Joe Rogan invites quacks without actually using those words. This ship for this sort of gaslighting has long sailed. Please do not do this. People have had enough of this disinfo-in-all-but-name only for the past two years. You will seem duplicitous if you do this sort of stuff.