3 ms·
You’re basically saying that if a company is successful it should be taken from its owners without compensation. And you claim (with no evidence) that there ar
by JackFr 5y ago
You’re basically saying that if a company is successful it should be taken from its owners without compensation.
And you claim (with no evidence) that there are good arguments for this.
- jedberg 5y agoI never said taking anything from anyone without compensation. I said when someone dies the board of the company should decide where the shares go. I didn't say anything about their estate not getting compensated. Would it be clearer if I said that the board should get to decide who can buy the shares, whether that be the estate (who would pay itself for them) or someone else?