5 ms·
interesting, but largest ever? not according to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gz4adJXLHgA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gz4adJXLHgA which got very di
by senectus1 5y ago
interesting, but largest ever?
not according to this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gz4adJXLHgA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gz4adJXLHgA
which got very different results
- dtech 5y agoPost in the thread [1] gives a very plausibly-sounding hypothesis for seeing different results in non-western countries like your link. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30720766 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30720766
- senectus1 5y agoahh yes i see. yes that sort of information is quite vacant from these stats.
- bildung 5y agoThat is a very low quality study because it a) employed self-selection instead of a proper RCT design and b) didn't control for anything. At least tracking pre-existing conditions would have been necessary, when not randomizing, for the results to have any meaning. When studying the effects of invermectin, at least checking for worms in the patients' feces would have been needed.