3 ms·
But they never said that that it is faster than 3090, they said it uses 60% less power for the same performance. The shady thing they did is they trimmed the pl
by YetAnotherNick 5y ago
But they never said that that it is faster than 3090, they said it uses 60% less power for the same performance. The shady thing they did is they trimmed the plot by watts to remove full performance of 3090, which might be intentional to give wrong idea to most. But it was clear to me it doesn't have same performance as 3090.
- vbezhenar 5y agohttps://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/oWgfEtRLYJkM3sQZm5UcQY-970-80.png.webp https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/oWgfEtRLYJkM3sQZm5UcQY-970...
- microtonal 5y agoOn the other hand, the plot of the 3090 flattens so much @ 320W, that you wouldn't suspect a doubling of performance at its peak wattage (which I think is ~360W?). Of course, this is marketing material. But as far as I am concerned, the jury is still out, I'd like to see a benchmark with native binaries (non-Rosetta) and some optimization for Metal. Though even if the performance was half of the RTX 3090, that would be mighty impressive. I have an RTX 3090 on my desk and under full load it is loud and consumes a lot of power. Mac Studio + M1 Ultra's fans are apparently barely audible.