I understand what you are saying... and you are right for most of it. You have to change your mindset a bit to use a static site generator. But you should keep

I understand what you are saying... and you are right for most of it. You have to change your mindset a bit to use a static site generator. But you should keep in mind that "classic content management systems" have some major disadvantages, that are real: - security - a static site tends to have less vulnerabilities and security issues - performance - there is nothing faster than a static site, if the webserver is configured properly - maintainability - a static site has no database and is easy to version control, backup/restore and manage > Then a proper editor feels nice. And there is no one that prevents you from setting up "content management" for a static site generator... I tend to use my JetBrains IDE, but there is also Typora or MarkText for editing my files. > It also lets you have more metadata without resorting to a weird data format. Hugo supports external data files, and with little effort, even static site search. See https://pilabor.com/blog/2021/05/building-a-blog-with-hugo/#site-search https://pilabor.com/blog/2021/05/building-a-blog-with-hugo/#.... > Besides, you can just log in and change something. You can use github actions for deployment, then you can just use github editor to change something. Just my 2 cents. Maybe try it for a smaller site... it's awesome.