2 ms·
Yes, but if there are close to 0 games that don't require Rosetta, what's the point? Disclosing a theoretical emulation overhead that can't be proven would even
by bkolobara 5y ago
Yes, but if there are close to 0 games that don't require Rosetta, what's the point? Disclosing a theoretical emulation overhead that can't be proven would even be worse.
It's either this or no comparison at all. And it's a game that apple often uses in their promotional materials.
- Closi 5y ago> Yes, but if there are close to 0 games that don't require Rosetta, what's the point? Because it's not being marketed as a gaming computer, and other use-cases aren't run under Rosetta (e.g. 3D rendering, video editing etc). e.g. Apple's marketing doesn't claim gaming performance, it claims this: > You can run complex particle simulations or work with massive 3D environments that were previously impossible to render. And with twice the media engine resources, M1 Ultra can support up to 18 streams of 8K ProRes 422 video playback — something no other personal computer can do. Their marketing page doesn't even mention games...