4 ms·
>If they didn't they aren't doing their job. I meant that as did they notice it was a user who caused it instead of an unknown bug.
by FrenchDevRemote 5y ago
>If they didn't they aren't doing their job.
I meant that as did they notice it was a user who caused it instead of an unknown bug.
- rzzzwilson 5y agoAny outage should be noticed and the cause identified, bug or user.
- FrenchDevRemote 5y agoYes, the cause should be identified, in ideal conditions. But saying that they're not doing their job because they struggle to identify the specific user that caused a bug is a bit of a stretch.
- rzzzwilson 5y agoI didn't say anything about "identifying a particular user". When I said "the cause identified, bug or user" I didn't mean the particular user, but the series of user actions that lead to the outage. Outages caused by user action shouldn't be able to happen, so I think they are really what you call an unknown bug. Any person running a website that tries to blame a user for non-malicious actions that cause an outage is just trying to shift blame from where it rightly belongs.