4 ms·
Let’s not dilute terrorism more. Doing so is diminishes what real victims have experienced.
by google234123 5y ago
Let’s not dilute terrorism more. Doing so is diminishes what real victims have experienced.
- bejelentkezni 5y agoIt is politically-motivated destruction of property. I don't know how much more textbook you want it to be.
- 4khilles 5y agoThat's not at all close to textbook terrorism. There's no violence or intimidation. It's not even clear whether this is unlawful.
- Thiez 5y agoIntentional destruction of property is considered unlawful in most societies. I'm not sure why you would even question that?
- jaxn 5y agoCan it be terrorism when counter-attacking the aggressor?
- postsantum 5y agoIt's not the agressor, it's general population that happened to live in the same place
- woodruffw 5y agoYou'll note that the operative word "terror" isn't present in "politically-motivated destruction of property." Terrorism means something specific: it means inflicting terror as an end in itself.
- tomcatfish 5y agoTerrorism doesn't have "terror as an end in itself" either. Almost no one ever has terror as "an end in itself". Not saying parent's defn is correct, but I don't like this one either.