4 ms·
Do you mean that you would want that to happen on the web server, if they detect a user-agent that doesn't support JXL, they would convert back to JPEG? That se
by remram 5y ago
Do you mean that you would want that to happen on the web server, if they detect a user-agent that doesn't support JXL, they would convert back to JPEG? That seems pointlessly costly in CPU.
Also like mkl said, there doesn't seem to be any evidence that JXL->JPEG can be done losslessly.
- pabs3 5y agoI tried it locally on my computer, JPEG -> JXL -> JPEG results in two bitwise identical JPEGs.
- rasz 5y agoDont know about web servers, but there are people doing it on the backup/storage side. https://dropbox.tech/infrastructure/lepton-image-compression-saving-22-losslessly-from-images-at-15mbs https://dropbox.tech/infrastructure/lepton-image-compression...