8 ms·
Presumably Forrest has limited recourse against the advertisers because they're behind shell companies (or similar) in countries with limited legal consequences
by prawn 5y ago
Presumably Forrest has limited recourse against the advertisers because they're behind shell companies (or similar) in countries with limited legal consequences. As a result, I can't see a solution that doesn't involve countries requiring publishers to filter advertising sources.
I'm guessing this sort of thing isn't politically urgent or important so the public is left dealing with the mess. Without an ad blocker, I can't see how you could even start to escape scams getting in your face.
- senectus1 5y agoMake the publisher accountable. which is what he's trying to do.