The otherwise quite good article repeats the common mistake of not understanding that what Intel calls the feature size (e.g. 10nm) is not equivalent to what TS

The otherwise quite good article repeats the common mistake of not understanding that what Intel calls the feature size (e.g. 10nm) is not equivalent to what TSMC calls it, giving the incorrect impression that Intel is further behind than they are. Intel 10nm is the same density as TSMC 7nm. But I suppose you could argue that this is Intel's own fault for not doing much about that misunderstanding.