So, essentially, they require the company to pretend that they destroyed the "algorithm" (I think they actually mean machine learning model). If they don't, or

So, essentially, they require the company to pretend that they destroyed the "algorithm" (I think they actually mean machine learning model). If they don't, or they do but they had a copy, or they had used the knowledge to know which if several general purpose algorithms worked better at approximating it, there's essentially no way for an outside enforcement agency to know, and even with a whistleblower there's a real problem trying to enforce it. How do you prove, even if you have the database seized, which data the machine learning model came from? It's the same problem with saying "destroy that data", which is also difficult to enforce (and probably isn't), except that it's an additional level of difficulty in enforcing. I'm not saying they don't have a point, I'm just saying I don't see how they will be able to enforce this, even with whistleblowers. Whistleblower: "that ML model came from illegal data" Company: "No, it didn't." ...