4 ms·
Unlike you, I’ve answered your question many times. You are only looking at the benefit for a narrow use case without accounting for its holistic costs. We have
by jshen 5y ago
Unlike you, I’ve answered your question many times. You are only looking at the benefit for a narrow use case without accounting for its holistic costs. We have a difference of opinion about those costs, and there is no hard science that can prove either of us right. I have acknowledged your point of view, and the possibility that it could be right. You have not reciprocated in any way, or even acknowledge that you understand the point I’m making.
- pie_flavor 5y agoDiversity doesn't have anything to do with holistic costs. You shift between whether you're talking about holistic costs and whether you're talking about diversity depending on which part of the point you're making. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy