3 ms·
It is in no way comparable to the ultra deep field. That's optical. This is sub-millimetre (the region between infra-red and microwave). You see entirely differ
by hugh3 15y ago
It is in no way comparable to the ultra deep field. That's optical. This is sub-millimetre (the region between infra-red and microwave). You see entirely different things, and use 'em for entirely different purposes. It's like saying that a Formula 1 car isn't better than a mining truck -- it's a meaningless comparison.
Unless you're just saying that the images aren't as pretty as the Hubble Deep Field, in which case I agree. Things always look prettier in optical than in radio.
- VladRussian 15y agojust let the rest 60 somewhat telescopes to come online in addition to these 20 - the sharpness/detalization will get an order better
- bkudria 15y ago"Things always look prettier in optical than in radio." This is just an opinion expressed in an unusual way, right?