4 ms·
> an expensive car that does not look good Seriously? What cars, in your opinion, do look good? > It's not faster or better than other cars 0-60 in 5.5sec 4
by fr0sty 15y ago
> an expensive car that does not look good
Seriously? What cars, in your opinion, do look good?
> It's not faster or better than other cars
0-60 in 5.5sec
400Nm torque
Those numbers are nothing to sneeze at. Yes it is expensive. It is a low-volume exotic all-electric car. what are you expecting?
- true_religion 15y ago5.5 seconds isn't that great for the class of car it's in. The Roadster is a sports car. It's 30k more than a 911 Carerra and slower in 0-60. That said its torque curve is amazing which means you don't have to stamp on the gas pedal, and handle the transmission like a race car driver to get that 0-60 time.
- fr0sty 15y agoYou have your prices backwards. Tesla S is $50k(est) and the 911 Carerra is $79k. Also, the S is a four-door sport sedan that seats up to 7, not a two-seat sports car.
- true_religion 15y agoThe Tesla S is 50k. I'm talking about the Tesla Roadster. I assumed he was too because of the 0-60 time, but I see I was wrong. So my point is invalidated. Oops.