> So if two literal paintings made centuries ago can cause a hash collision, there's no way this ever should have been considered for matching against files tha

> So if two literal paintings made centuries ago can cause a hash collision, there's no way this ever should have been considered for matching against files that no one else can see or research with for the most serious crime/reputation damage imaginable. It simply does not follow that the classifier for CSAM would have the same rate of false positives. There isn't enough information to infer that.