4 ms·

A lot of great art is free what you mean is the art perceived as "expensive" by the art industry. Cisco vs OpenSource...

• auggierose 5y ago
  No, what I mean is that producing great art usually has a high cost. A particular work of art might have been created just in the spur of a moment, but the artist getting to that point usually had a cost, too. Consuming art often is free indeed, but this should not be confused with the cost of producing it, and I had the feeling that the comment I originally answered to did just that.
  • throwmeariver1 5y ago
    No you just believe art must have a value either from the artists skillset or materials and this is just not true at all.
    • auggierose 5y ago
      We seem to talk past each other. That's ok.
    • yesenadam 5y ago
      You could listen to what auggierose is saying instead of just repeatedly telling him what he really means. Then this exchange might have value.