3 ms·
Could? Yes. It'd probably be the most expensive way to get rid of CO2, though.
by deadbeeves 5y ago
Could? Yes. It'd probably be the most expensive way to get rid of CO2, though.
- worik 5y ago> Could? Yes. It'd probably be the most expensive way to get rid of CO2, though. So? I in this context that is a plus not a minus!
- deadbeeves 5y agoHow is that a plus? If it's more expensive it means you're pulling less CO2 out of the atmosphere than if had gone with a cheaper method.
- samstave 5y agoWHY THE FUCK ARE YOU CONCERNED WITH EXPENSE RATHER THAN SURVIVAL? --- Serious question. -- musk. (and ppl like Thiel cooncerned with eternal life (Rocks, Roths, etc)....