> No, despite your assertions to the contrary, we have addressed your arguments. Who is we? Are you working with someone? Are you part of some goup? > Please

> No, despite your assertions to the contrary, we have addressed your arguments. Who is we? Are you working with someone? Are you part of some goup? > Please read the links provided. I have. Even before you provided it. What about "Once I believed in the ughyur genocide propaganda" did't you understand? And no. You haven't addressed anything. I asked you specific questions and instead of answering them, you are telling me to go find the answers. The only reason you'd do that is because I'm right and you can't answer my questions. > To those reading along the thread: qiskit is engaging in a very common apologetics approach intended to sow doubt on obvious things. Nice try. Do you realize you come off as someone reading a script rather than someone truly interested in facts or reason. > It proceeds by asking insincere "simple questions", ignoring responses Simple questions like "How does a population increase during a genocide" isn't insincere just because it makes a mockery of your false assertion. > This has been used by Russia as of late in their media Don't you mean the "CCP"? When I wrote: "Oh there it is. "Whataboutism" and it's obvious what is going on here." I called it.