It will be obscure and niche historical curiosity that only people researching the period will know in depth, though in their own interpretation like "The 1990

It will be obscure and niche historical curiosity that only people researching the period will know in depth, though in their own interpretation like "The 1990's aesthetic". Its far more likely, entire centuries will be culturally compressed into future equivalent of "Middle Ages" and given broad-stroke popculture treatment that will distill major 'art' into modern form that masses will consume as cultural product(like e.g. Medieval European fantasy genre) in form of pseudo-historical entertainment. What will likely survive longest is factual/historical/technical documents that have some mundane utility or significance(treaties/manuals/licenses) as long as civilization stands. Art on the other hand is subjective and tastes/preferences often change with new generations forming new art. "Classics" survive largely due institutions promoting their use and will become more obscure without state support. We have this assumption that "current culture" is valuable forever but same could be said of all past cultural period, that were replaced by "current year culture": given that technological progress allows easier culture creation it would be highly likely a single person in a future would generate equivalent of "entire classical culture" tailor-made for his taste by AI or something similar in a minute, without the need to study or even know about its existence.