> "maximal freedom of speech protects vulnerable people from erasure" It's very easy to say things like this without fully comprehending all of the implication

> "maximal freedom of speech protects vulnerable people from erasure" It's very easy to say things like this without fully comprehending all of the implications. Here's an example: Google restricted the usage of its own product, Google Maps, in an effort to halt the killing of Ukrainians by Russian armed forces, who were using Google Maps to launch their operations. This directly contradicts your claim.